Does Ridgid Stealth Force Have Less Power In Reverse News & Opinion

Does the Ridgid Stealth Force Have Less Power in Reverse?


Reader Question: Does the Ridgid Stealth Force Have Less Power in Reverse than in Forward?

The question of the Ridgid Stealth Force’s power has come up a few times and now that we have some concrete data, it’s time to answer it. So does the Ridgid Stealth Force have less power in forward than in reverse?

10-Second Summary

  • The Ridgid Stealth Force has an estimated 2979 in-lbs of actual tightening torque and 2880 in-lbs of loosening torque in our tests
  • Evaluating our test results and methods shows that the fastening and breakaway torques are effectively the same
  • Standard impact drivers actually hit harder in reverse than in forward in our tests

SUPPORT OUR ADVERTISERS

How Much Torque Does the Ridgid Stealth Force Have?

In our testing—which doesn’t replace manufacturer’s specification tests—the Ridgid Stealth Force has 2376 in-lbs of fastening torque and 2880 in-lbs of loosening torque. That’s on hardened steel bolts that have a little grease on them.

Does Ridgid Stealth Force Have Less Power In Reverse

It’s Really About the Testing Method

If you checked out our testing methods, there’s a good chance you’ve already spotted the solution. We use the amount of torque it takes to remove a bolt for our fastening measurement and we fasten each bolt to a specific torque to test breakaway.

It takes roughly 80% of the amount of torque to loosen a bolt that it does to fasten it to the same point. So let’s look at those original numbers one more time.

  • Fastening Torque: 2376 in-lbs
  • Breakaway Torque: 2880 in-lbs

Since it takes an average of 2376 in-lbs to loosen what the Stealth Force fastened, we can estimate how much actual fastening force it delivered using a proportion.

It comes out to 2979 in-lbs. That’s a 3.4% difference between the loosening and breakaway measurements.

There’s another caveat—that breakaway torque value is a minimum number. It breaks that consistently, but not the next level up (3000 in-lbs). So it’s actual breakaway force is somewhere between 2880 and 2999 in-lbs.

Given the amount of error in impact testing and that 80% number can fluctuate a few percentage points, it’s close enough to say it’s putting out the same torque in both forward and reverse.

What About Standard Impact Drivers?

Looking at our Pro brands, most standard impact drivers show an 8%–25% difference compared to Ridgid’s 3.4%. The takeaway?

Standard impact drivers actually do seem to hit harder in reverse than in forward. For the amount of fastening torque the Stealth Force has, it certainly feels underpowered in reverse compared to what we’re used to from standard impact drivers or impact wrenches.

Does Ridgid Stealth Force Have Less Power In Reverse

Other Reasons a Standard Impact Driver Feels Different than the Stealth Force

Differences in Mechanics

Ridgid Stealth Force Screw DrivingDrive screws with any hydraulic impact driver and it’s immediately clear that they don’t hit as hard as standard impact drivers. That’s part of how they keep the noise level down. It’s also the reason their torque values are lower—and often not even listed on the spec sheet.

Ridgid’s hammer/anvil mechanism is different, too. Using a system that’s more elliptical, the hammer slides past the anvil more than striking it out of the way. It’s why the hydraulic impact driver feels more like a hard push and the standard impact driver feels more like a violent punch.

Each manufacturer can spec their hammer/anvil mechanisms the way they want and there are certainly some differences between them.

The Stealth Force’s no-load speeds in forward and reverse are within a few RPM on our tachometer. Ridgid’s design simply seems to have a lower fastening to loosening torque ratio.

Differences in Time

Because hydraulic impact drivers hit softer, they need more time to reach their peak torque in both forward and reverse. I did some separate breakaway tests from our shootout and it took as long as 8 seconds to effectively break a nut torqued at Ridgid’s peak loosening potential.

The same goes for fastening torque—it takes longer to reach the actual peak.

I mention that because we had to pick a standard amount of time for our testing. In fact, we used two methods to account for impacts that hit hard out of the gate and others that hit softer. So our results aren’t perfect in the hydraulic class, but they do reflect a standardized method so they’re all tested the same way.

SUPPORT OUR ADVERTISERS

The Bottom Line

Does the Ridgid Stealth Force have less power in reverse than forward? The question is rooted in its use as an automotive tool for breaking lug nuts. Unfortunately, this is still an impact driver at heart and an impact wrench is the right tool for that job.

For the screw fastening jobs an impact driver is designed for, I don’t notice any issues in the Ridgid Stealth Force’s ability to effectively remove the same screws it can fully drive. The torque values we measured in our testing back that up. In the end, the math suggests that it has the same amount of torque in reverse as it does in forward.

2
Leave a Reply

avatar
1 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Kenny KoehlerJörg Albrecht Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jörg Albrecht
Member
Jörg Albrecht

What kind of ridiculous nonsense is this? Notwithstanding the fact that one requires more torque to breakaway a fastener than to tighten one, even your math is obviously wrong. The difference between 2376 and 2880 is not 3.4% as the author has stated but rather, it’s 17.5%.