September 28, 2021

Professional Tool Reviews for Pros

SawStop Lawsuit Against Table Saw Makers Dismissed

SawStop Lawsuit

SawStop Lawsuit Accused Corporate Conspiracy

The word “conspiracy” is never a pleasant one to hear tossed around about the corporate world, especially when it involves companies you respect in an industry that you love. Recently, and fortunately, a lawsuit was dismissed by the court against virtually all of the major players in the power tool industry. SawStop, LLC had accused many companies of conspiring against adopting their table saw safety technology in an effort to avoid creating a new safety standard.

SawStop Technology is a safety feature found on table saws that is able to detect when it comes into contact with flesh and immediately stops the blade. This happens so quickly that the user is left with only a small nick where the skin touched the blade. At tradeshows, SawStop reps used a hot dog to represent a finger and showed how the saw would cut through wood and immediately stop on contact with the hot dot.

This is obviously a very impressive technology that would potentially save thousands of trips to the emergency room each year (the  SawStop lawsuit claimed over 30,000 annually) as well as millions of dollars in medical costs (the suit claims an average of $35,000 per incident). The suit specifically claimed that manufactures conspired to reject the inclusion of the SawStop Technology in their standard table saw production as a group. By doing this, it would eliminate companies that did not include it from being at a liability disadvantage from those that did. In addition, it implicates Underwriters Laboratory (UL) from requiring the technology as standard on all table saws.

According to sources, the inclusion of SawStop Technology would add roughly $100 to the price of each table saw. While this might not be a big deal on a saw that costs $2000 or $3000, it is a significant increase on a $400 saw.

The SawStop lawsuit alleged that the group of manufacturers violated the Sherman Antitrust Act. Basically the act states that if you have an entire industry market share because you are just simply better and smarter than everyone else, there’s no issue. If you have that advantage because you have manipulated the market to eliminate competition, then there is the condition of a monopoly or cartel. The SawStop lawsuit was filed under the assumption that the manufacturers manipulated SawStop’s ability to compete in the industry.

Each of the manufacturers in the SawStop lawsuit had been in negotiations to include their technology in table saws, but broke them off. SawStop claims that they collectively decided to pursue the development of their own technology and to eliminate SawStop’s injury protection from becoming a required standard.

SawStop sought over $20 million in damages. They do sell their own branded table saws with the SawStop Technology built in. You can check out their products by clicking here.

Here is a link to the lawsuit documentation if you’d like to peruse through the details.

Related articles

How to Care for Power Tools Properly

If you’re a professional tradesman, the power tools of the trade are how you make your living. They also represent one of your largest expenses! Of course, this also holds true in the garage or workshop for the DIYer or hobbyist. Knowing how to care for power tools properly helps you improve both the safety and […]

LED vs Halogen Work Lights and Bulbs on Jobsites

We’ve traditionally used a lot of bulb-based lighting on our jobsites. While LED started making some headway in the past several years, only a few companies are bringing LED technology to larger construction area lights and even temporary lighting. These new lights cover anything from illuminating specific areas to flooding large jobsites with up to […]

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It’s a shame that Sawstop tried to bully the industry into using their technology. I’ve never used their saws but the reviews I’ve read gave them very positive ones. The shame is that Sawstop didn’t just rely on the quality of their product and market the advantage that the flesh detecting feature gives their product. I wonder what the price point was that Sawstop offered to other manufacturers. Looks to me that if it was reasonable that other manufacturers would have worked out a deal with Sawstop and saved themselves the R&D time and money to add this feature to… Read more »

Good! Accidents only happen when people use a tool improperly. Think of it as Darwinism at work.


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x