DeWalt FlexVolt Framing Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw Framing Tool Reviews

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw


I’m not sure you could have teed up a grudge match any better than 2017 did with the DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw. These two kings of the cordless circular saw world make for one of the most requested head to heads we’ve received from our audience. So let’s dive in.

SUPPORT OUR ADVERTISERS

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw: General Design

At the beginning of the DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw conversation, there’s not a lot that separates the two in basic appearance. As the first cordless saws to challenge the corded worm drive market, both go with a blade left, rear-handle design. You can use the same 7-1/4″ blade for both, but you’ll need to pop off the diamond knockout for the FlexVolt.

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw: A Cordless Worm Drive?

There’s also not much separating them in the feature set. You get a blade brake, magnesium base, rafter hook, and brushless motor no matter which one you choose. If a cutline blower is a make-or-break feature for you, realize that Makita does not have one.

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw: A Cordless Worm Drive?

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw: Power Source

Power source makes up a key difference between the two saws. DeWalt uses their FlexVolt 60V Max battery. The kits come with either a FlexVolt 6.0 or 9.0 battery.

Makita’s saw is on their 18V X2 platform, so you need two batteries to use it. These can be anywhere on Makita’s 18V LXT range, but we recommend going with their 5.0 aH packs that you can get with the kit.

In terms of potential energy, you’ll get either 120 watt hours (FlexVolt 6.0) or 180 watt hours (FlexVolt 9.0) with DeWalt. With Makita, two 5.0 aH packs will give you 180 watt hours while 6.0 aH packs will give you 216 watt hours. Makita has the advantage on the high end here.

Geek note: Normally, watt hours are calculated as nominal voltage x amp hours which would make DeWalt 108 and 162 watt hours, respectively. However, the batteries have the watt hours printed on the battery as 120 and 180.

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw

The good thing with Makita’s system is that those batteries work on all of their 18V LXT tools and you can grab batteries from any of the other tools in the line – even compact packs in a pinch – to power the saw.

DeWalt’s FlexVolt battery will work in any of their FlexVolt or 20V Max tools, but you can’t grab a 20V Max battery and use it in the FlexVolt saw. So from a system-wide compatibility standpoint, Makita holds the edge here as well.

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw: Ergonomics

Neither one of these saws is lightweight – nor should you expect them to be. Worm drive circular saws are much heavier than their sidewinder counterparts and these follow suit. The difference in weight is significant. Makita weighs in at 12 lbs, 10.8 oz with a Diablo framing blade and two 5.0 aH batteries on board. DeWalt is more than a pound heavier at 13 lbs, 11.8 oz with the same blade and FlexVolt 9.0 pack. Makita’s the clear winner there.

With nearly identical safeties and triggers, the feel boils down to handle design. DeWalt gives a slightly more form-fitting main handle, though I wouldn’t call either one uncomfortable for this class of tool.

DeWalt FlexVolt Framing Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw

The support handles angle out nearly identically and neither have overmold here. Makita sticks with a more traditional thin diameter bar while DeWalt gives you a wider handle with contours. I give the nod to DeWalt here since I like the wider support handle.

DeWalt FlexVolt Framing Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw: Cutting Capacity

With a 7-1/4″ blade, both of these saws are very close to each other in cutting capacity. Makita (2-9/16″) holds a slight edge over DeWalt (2-7/16″) at 90°. However, DeWalt (1-7/8″) takes over at a 45° bevel with Makita cutting 1-3/4″ at the same angle.

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw

Since both saws also have the same 53° bevel capacity, Makita gets the nod for 90° cuts and DeWalt for 45°. But with only 1/8″ separating each one, very few Pros will find that one doesn’t get the job done over the other. It’s worth noting that Makita can make it through 3x material in one pass thanks to the extra capacity.

DeWalt FlexVolt Framing Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw: Performance

We put a Diablo Framing Blade with Tracking Point on both saws and led through a series of full depth rip cuts in 8′ long 4×4 pressure treated lumber. Well, almost full depth. Since Makita has a slightly deeper capacity, we set it to match DeWalt at 2-7/16″. We also put them up against Milwaukee’s M18 Fuel Circular Saw and Skilsaw’s SPT77WM-22 worm drive. The results were astounding, especially considering how wet the wood was!

  • Milwaukee M18 Fuel Circular Saw – 1:04.96

 

  • Skilsaw SPT77MW-22 – 0:27.96

Skilsaw SPT77WM-22 Worm Drive

We're taking a look at some pretty bold circular saw claims over the next few days. Here's our baseline test with Skilsaw's SPT77WM-22 worm drive making a full depth rip cut in some wet 4×4 PT pine.

Posted by Pro Tool Reviews on Tuesday, January 16, 2018

  • Makita Rear-Handle Saw – 0:18.64

Makita 18VX2 LXT Rear-Handle Circular Saw

Makita Tools USA 18V X2 LXT Brushless Rear-Handle Circular Saw Vs Really Wet 4×4 PT Pine for 8' of fun. Thoughts?

Posted by Pro Tool Reviews on Wednesday, January 17, 2018

  • DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw – 0:11.36

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw

DEWALT claims to have the most powerful cordless circular saw on the market. Here's a full depth rip cut in really wet 4×4 PT pine. What do you think?

Posted by Pro Tool Reviews on Thursday, January 18, 2018

Milwaukee proves that an 18V circular saw can make a full depth rip cut and Skilsaw set our baseline since it’s an outstanding corded model. Both Makita and DeWalt blew the corded model out of the water easily. As you can see from the results, DeWalt can walk away from this head to head with some swagger in their step.

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw: Price

Price is relative since some users need batteries and other might not. Here’s how it breaks down.

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw

  • DeWalt DCS577B bare tool $249
  • DeWalt DCS577T1 FlexVolt 6.0 kit $369
  • DeWalt DCS577X1 FlexVolt 9.0 kit $379

Makita Rear-Handle Saw

  • Makita XSR01Z bare tool $199
  • Makita XSR01PT 5.0 aH kit $349

Whether you’re in the market for the kit or just the bare tool, there’s no doubt that Makita gets the win in price. As a premium tool manufacturer, that’s not something we get to say a whole lot with Makita. So the question you have to answer is whether the extra power of the DeWalt Framing Saw is worth an extra $30 – $50.

SUPPORT OUR ADVERTISERS

The Bottom Line

The DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw and Makita Rear-Handle Saw are so close to each other in design that it really boils down to whether you want the more powerful/better handle ergonomics or the better price/lighter weight. You can also factor in which cordless lineup is more attractive to you. DeWalt has the clear advantage in power, but both outperform corded worm drives handily. As the top two cordless circular saws in the industry currently, there’s really not a wrong answer here.

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw Vs Makita Rear-Handle Saw on Paper

DeWalt FlexVolt Worm Drive Style Saw Specs

  • Model: Dewalt DCS577
  • Power Source: DeWalt FlexVolt 60V Battery
  • RPM: 5800
  • Blade Diameter: 7-1/4″ (diamond knockout required)
  • Weight with Diablo Framing Blade and FlexVolt 9.0 Battery: 13 lb 11.8 oz
  • Bevel Stops: 22.5°, 45°
  • Bevel Capacity: 53°
  • Capacity @ 90°: 2-7/16″
  • Depth @ 45°: 1-7/8″

Features

  • Blade brake
  • Blade left orientation
  • Integrated dust blower
  • Brushless motor
  • Magnesium shoe
  • Rafter hook

Makita Rear-Handle Saw

  • Model: Makita XSR01
  • Power Source: 2x Makita 18V LXT batteries
  • RPM: 5100
  • Blade Diameter: 7-1/4″
  • Weight with Diablo Framing Blade and (2) 5.0 Ah Batteries: 12lb 10.8 oz
  • Bevel Stops: 22.5°, 45°
  • Bevel Capacity: 53°
  • Capacity @ 90°: 2-9/16″
  • Depth @ 45°: 1-3/4″

Features

  • Blade brake
  • Blade left orientation
  • Brushless motor
  • Magnesium shoe
  • Rafter hook
  • Automatic Speed Change
  • Tether notch

32
Leave a Reply

avatar
14 Comment threads
18 Thread replies
2 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
19 Comment authors
Kenny Koehlerdouble u deetravlncarpntrTom TillmanC R Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
double u dee
Guest
double u dee

test was rigged bad…look at where the dewalt blade exits….he was running it in the same slot the other saw was in..my lil 6inch trim saw would do it that quick in a precut kerf…makita rules…

Tom Tillman
Guest

One curious thing about the dewalt 60v worm is that they are not sold in stores. You have to order it no matter where you buy it. no displays. You cannot touch it first.

C R
Guest
C R

Seems a little silly to not utilize the full cutting depth capacity of the Makita in the head to head test. Not that it would’ve had a huge impact, but it would’ve been more ideal since that’s someone with the unit would utilize. Did you try it with it’s full cutting capacity to see if that improved the speed in the test?

Joe
Guest
Joe

Always fun to read PTR at lunch. Their sponsors must love them, just saying enough good things about each brand. Truth is the Flexvolt rear handle is far superior to the makita in every way. The better comparison is with the Flexvolt 575 circ saw as it also beats the makita rear handle for much less money. ….

Glass
Guest
Glass

Run time ? Most say the Makita spanks the Dewalt here. This one of the most critical tests and battery charge turnaround. Without this factored in this comparison is lacking.